International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 6 Issue 6 November-December 2024 Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

A Retrospective Study on Comparison Between Surgical and Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Pseudocyst and Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis

Author(s) Abhigyan Das, Rohit Sharma, Debashree Saha, Poojan Vyas
Country India
Abstract BACKGROUND:
Surgical management is the standard approach for pancreatic pseudocyst and walled off pancreatic necrosis. With newly evolving procedures and a comprehensive approach, management of walled off pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic pseudocyst is taking a new turn. A multi-centric study comparing surgical and endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst and walled off pancreatic necrosis was performed.
METHODS:
Data was collected retrospectively from multiple centers and patients were followed up till date since the time of intervention. The outcomes were therapeutic success, post-operative complications, recurrence rate, mortality and duration of hospitalization.
RESULTS:
At the end of the follow-up period, none of the patients who received endoscopic intervention had a recurrence, compared to 2 patients in the surgical group. There was 16.67% mortality in the surgical group and only 3.33% mortality in the endoscopic group. Significantly high mortality was seen in the patients with Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis treated surgically, compared to no mortality in the patients treated endoscopically. 86 % of the patients in the endoscopic group had resolution of the disease following intervention compared to 70% in the other group. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, resolution or recurrence of disease following intervention between the two groups. However, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients who underwent endoscopic intervention than open surgery.
CONCLUSION:
Endoscopic drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts and Walled off Pancreatic necrosis have demonstrated a therapeutic success rate, mortality and recurrence statistically comparable to that seen in surgical treatment, but with reduced time of hospitalization, supporting its use as the preferred initial modality for drainage.
Keywords Pancreatic Pseudocyst, Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis, Endoscopic, Surgical, Management
Field Medical / Pharmacy
Published In Volume 5, Issue 6, November-December 2023
Published On 2023-12-25
Cite This A Retrospective Study on Comparison Between Surgical and Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Pseudocyst and Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis - Abhigyan Das, Rohit Sharma, Debashree Saha, Poojan Vyas - IJFMR Volume 5, Issue 6, November-December 2023. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.11082
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.11082
Short DOI https://doi.org/gs98qq
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 5Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 4

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9898-5948-55 editor@ijfmr.com