International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 6 Issue 6 November-December 2024 Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

An Empirical Study on Laboratory Sample Rejections

Author(s) D Shreedevi, Diddige Vikas
Country India
Abstract Clinical laboratory plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of the patients. The increased focus on the patient safety and awareness that the information provided by these laboratories has direct impact on diagnosis and treatment requires that laboratories prioritize reduction in error rates. For patients safety the laboratory has the right to refuse samples that are incompletely, incorrectly labelled because of wrong methods of collection, storage and transportation.
Despite the remarkable advances and the modern innovations which have transformed laboratory diagnostics from manual and labour- intensive service to fully automated process, the clinical laboratory still shows a number of pre-analytical errors that might lead to erroneous patient diagnosis and treatment that follows.
The present study is to analyse the reason for rejections of the tests and lab related incidents. Every sample that reaches the laboratory is considered for the calculation to improve the laboratory practices by using quality indicators. The major findings of the study are that most rejections are happening at pre-analytical phase.
The study suggests several changes in the sample collection and transportation process. Rejections of the samples are high because of human error which can be minimised by training technicians and staff members. Policies and procedures specific to specimen collection, transportation and preparation should be strictly followed.
Keywords Pre-analytical errors, Patient safety, Quality indicators, Rejections
Field Business Administration
Published In Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024
Published On 2024-02-22
Cite This An Empirical Study on Laboratory Sample Rejections - D Shreedevi, Diddige Vikas - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.13633
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.13633
Short DOI https://doi.org/gtjtxv
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 5Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 4

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9898-5948-55 editor@ijfmr.com