International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 6 Issue 6 November-December 2024 Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Sabarimala Verdict- A Constitutional Revolution

Author(s) Parul Kumari
Country India
Abstract India is a secular state, as enshrined in the Constitution of India. The preamble emphasizes the ideals of justice, liberty, equity and fraternity ensuring the state remains neutral in matters of religion. The very concept of secularism is based on the fact that the state will have no religion but it does not mean that it is
an irreligious or atheistic state. Nor is it an anti-religious state. It merely explains that the state has no religion of its own. However, it respects all religions and the constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all citizens fostering a diverse inclusive society. This paper deals revolves around The Sabarimala Temple case which revolves around the constitutional and cultural aspects of religious practices in India. The case sparked debates on the balances between religious freedom and gender equality. In 2018, the Supreme Court lifted the ban on the entry of women of menstruating age into the temple, challenging the tradition that restricted their access. While some hailed it as a progressive step, others argued for the preservation of cultural and religious practice. This abstract encapsulates the multifaceted dimensions of Sabarimala temple case, touching upon issues of constitutional rights, cultural sensitivity and ongoing dialogue between tradition and modernity.
Keywords Sabarimala Temple, Menstruating age, Secularism, Religion, Ayyappa, Celibacy, Hegemonic patriarchy
Published In Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024
Published On 2024-02-27
Cite This Sabarimala Verdict- A Constitutional Revolution - Parul Kumari - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.14072
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.14072
Short DOI https://doi.org/gtktgt
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 5Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 4

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9898-5948-55 editor@ijfmr.com