International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 6 Issue 6 November-December 2024 Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Exploring Patient Acceptance of Treatment Options for Single-Sided Deafness: A Comparative Study of Intervention Options

Author(s) Tanvi Chaudhary, Satyabrata Panigrahi
Country India
Abstract Background
Single-sided deafness (SSD) is a condition characterized by one ear having normal or near-normal hearing while the other ear experiences significantly impaired hearing. While there is no cure for permanent SSD, there are devices that can assist in restoring hearing sensation in the deaf ear.
Objective
To assess the acceptance of available treatment options in patients with Single sided deafness (SSD).

Methodology
The research involved 35 patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) who tried three different rehabilitative devices: Bone Conduction Device (BCD), Contra-Lateral Routing Of Signal (CROS), and Ultra power digital programmable hearing aids. Patients were also given the option to not use any hearing aid. They rated their satisfaction with each option on a 100-point scale. Additionally, patients were asked to choose which intervention they preferred, if any, and to explain their choice. Factors for not choosing a hearing aid were also explored.

Results
The research findings indicated that patients with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss expressed the highest satisfaction with the BCD softband (average score 83.97± 4.53), followed by the CROS hearing aid (74.71± 4.19) and the unaided condition (61.91± 6.35). In contrast, the ultra-power digital programmable hearing aid received the lowest satisfaction score (19.2± 4.28). Only 8 out of 35 patients chose to use a hearing aid. Among the 27 who did not opt for a hearing aid, reasons included concerns about appearance (13.63%), difficulty adapting (4.54%), financial limitations (22.72%), discomfort or irritation (9.09%), limited perceived benefit (13.63%), and a combination of these factors (36.36%).
Conclusion
Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) encounter challenges related to their hearing abilities. While the study indicates that these patients recognize the potential advantages of various intervention choices, they tend to refrain from adopting them due to a variety of factors.
Keywords Single Sided Deafness, Unilateral Hearing Loss, BCD, CROS, Ultra-Power Digital Hearing Aid
Field Medical / Pharmacy
Published In Volume 6, Issue 4, July-August 2024
Published On 2024-07-26
Cite This Exploring Patient Acceptance of Treatment Options for Single-Sided Deafness: A Comparative Study of Intervention Options - Tanvi Chaudhary, Satyabrata Panigrahi - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 4, July-August 2024. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.25162
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.25162
Short DOI https://doi.org/gt5hkh
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 5Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 4

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9898-5948-55 editor@ijfmr.com