International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 6 Issue 6 November-December 2024 Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Judicial Activism VIS-A-VIS Judicial Overreach: A Comparative Study

Author(s) Prerna Sharma
Country India
Abstract In India, the parliamentary system of government is used. There are three institutions of the state’s governance in our country: the legislature, which is accountable for passing legislation, the executive branch, which is in charge of putting laws into effect, and the judicial system, which comprehends laws passed by the legislature and gives the executive branch guidance when it fails to do so. Even when a clear separation of authority is impracticable, the three branches should work together and collaborate. In contrast to the US, India does not rigorously adhere to the idea of a division of strengths. Thanks to a system of keeping each branch at it’s own place that has been established, the court has the power to invalidate any unconstitutional legislation that the legislature approves. There is no question that the judiciary's role changes from the traditional position into a more proactively participating role to accommodate the progressive culture. The court system tries to uphold citizen rights and restrict constitutional violations by others, but it occasionally goes beyond the bounds of the system by applying judicial reasoning and intellect, which is when “judicial activism” is introduced. The goal of the contemporary judicial philosophy of "judicial activism" is to ensure fair and proper justice for everybody. It is stated that if judges utilize this tool arbitrarily, it should be considered judicial overreach.
Keywords Judicial Activism, Judicial Overreach, Judicial Restraint
Field Sociology > Administration / Law / Management
Published In Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023
Published On 2023-05-14
Cite This Judicial Activism VIS-A-VIS Judicial Overreach: A Comparative Study - Prerna Sharma - IJFMR Volume 5, Issue 3, May-June 2023. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3024
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3024
Short DOI https://doi.org/gr8p7f
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 5Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 4

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9898-5948-55 editor@ijfmr.com