International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024
Indexing Partners
Modern Kubernetes Ingress Solutions: an In-depth Comparison of Contour and Istio Architectures
Author(s) | Veeranjaneyulu Veeri |
---|---|
Country | United States |
Abstract | This article presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of Kubernetes ingress controllers Contour and Istio, addressing the critical challenge of traffic management in modern cloud-native architectures. With Kubernetes adoption reaching 83% among enterprises in 2023, the selection of appropriate ingress controllers significantly impacts application performance, security, and operational efficiency. Through quantitative analysis of performance metrics across varying load conditions (100-10,000 RPS) and real-world case studies, this article evaluates both solutions across multiple dimensions. Results demonstrate that Contour exhibits superior performance in simple to medium-scale deployments with 30% better latency characteristics (0.5-1.5ms per request) and a 45% smaller memory footprint, while Istio proves more effective for complex deployments, handling up to 75,000 requests per second and reducing service-to-service communication latency by up to 60%. Implementation case studies of an e-commerce platform and a financial services system reveal that Contour achieves 99.99% availability with 47% infrastructure cost reduction, while Istio provides comprehensive security features including automated mTLS implementation and advanced observability tools. The article concludes with a detailed decision framework and implementation guidelines, enabling organizations to select and optimize the most appropriate ingress controller based on their specific requirements, scale of operations, and security needs. The findings demonstrate that while both solutions excel in their targeted use cases, the choice between them should be guided by application complexity, performance requirements, and operational constraints. |
Keywords | Keywords: Kubernetes Ingress Controllers, Cloud-native Architecture, Service Mesh, Traffic Management, Microservices Security, Performance Analysis |
Field | Computer |
Published In | Volume 6, Issue 6, November-December 2024 |
Published On | 2024-11-16 |
Cite This | Modern Kubernetes Ingress Solutions: an In-depth Comparison of Contour and Istio Architectures - Veeranjaneyulu Veeri - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 6, November-December 2024. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.30753 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.30753 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g8rdzw |
Share this
E-ISSN 2582-2160
doi
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.