International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 7 Issue 1
January-February 2025
Indexing Partners
Collegium System in India
Author(s) | Pritam Ghosh |
---|---|
Country | India |
Abstract | The process of appointing and transferring judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts in India operates under the Judicial Collegium System. This framework, which has emerged through judicial interpretations rather than direct constitutional provisions, was primarily shaped by rulings in the Three Judges Cases. The system entrusts the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and a group of senior judges with the responsibility of recommending judicial appointments. A similar mechanism applies to High Courts, where the Chief Justice of the respective court plays a leading role. While the executive has the authority to seek clarifications or express reservations, repeated recommendations from the collegium ultimately prevail. Significant judicial pronouncements have influenced the evolution of this system. The First Judges Case (1981) ruled that "consultation" with the CJI did not equate to "concurrence." However, the Second Judges Case (1993) overturned this view, emphasizing the necessity of concurrence in judicial appointments. Later, the Third Judges Case (1998) reinforced the principle of collective decision-making by requiring a plurality of opinions in the selection process. The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act, 2014, sought to replace the collegium system but was struck down in 2015 on the grounds that it compromised judicial independence. Although the collegium system protects judicial autonomy, it has drawn criticism for its lack of transparency and potential biases. Concerns have been raised about the underrepresentation of marginalized communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Scheduled Castes (SCs), and Scheduled Tribes (STs), in judicial appointments. |
Keywords | Collegium System, Judicial Appointments, Judicial Independence, National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), Supreme Court, High Court, Transparency. |
Field | Sociology > Administration / Law / Management |
Published In | Volume 7, Issue 1, January-February 2025 |
Published On | 2025-02-02 |
Cite This | Collegium System in India - Pritam Ghosh - IJFMR Volume 7, Issue 1, January-February 2025. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.36293 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.36293 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/g83xw2 |
Share this
E-ISSN 2582-2160
doi
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.