International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 7, Issue 1 (January-February 2025) Submit your research before last 3 days of February to publish your research paper in the issue of January-February.

Collegium System in India

Author(s) Pritam Ghosh
Country India
Abstract The process of appointing and transferring judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts in India operates under the Judicial Collegium System. This framework, which has emerged through judicial interpretations rather than direct constitutional provisions, was primarily shaped by rulings in the Three Judges Cases. The system entrusts the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and a group of senior judges with the responsibility of recommending judicial appointments. A similar mechanism applies to High Courts, where the Chief Justice of the respective court plays a leading role. While the executive has the authority to seek clarifications or express reservations, repeated recommendations from the collegium ultimately prevail.
Significant judicial pronouncements have influenced the evolution of this system. The First Judges Case (1981) ruled that "consultation" with the CJI did not equate to "concurrence." However, the Second Judges Case (1993) overturned this view, emphasizing the necessity of concurrence in judicial appointments. Later, the Third Judges Case (1998) reinforced the principle of collective decision-making by requiring a plurality of opinions in the selection process. The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act, 2014, sought to replace the collegium system but was struck down in 2015 on the grounds that it compromised judicial independence.
Although the collegium system protects judicial autonomy, it has drawn criticism for its lack of transparency and potential biases. Concerns have been raised about the underrepresentation of marginalized communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Scheduled Castes (SCs), and Scheduled Tribes (STs), in judicial appointments.
Keywords Collegium System, Judicial Appointments, Judicial Independence, National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), Supreme Court, High Court, Transparency.
Field Sociology > Administration / Law / Management
Published In Volume 7, Issue 1, January-February 2025
Published On 2025-02-02
Cite This Collegium System in India - Pritam Ghosh - IJFMR Volume 7, Issue 1, January-February 2025. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.36293
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.36293
Short DOI https://doi.org/g83xw2

Share this