International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 7, Issue 2 (March-April 2025) Submit your research before last 3 days of April to publish your research paper in the issue of March-April.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 7 Issue 2
March-April 2025

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Evaluation of MAL Card Rapid Test Versus Microscopic Methods For Malaria Diagnosis In Resource-Limited Rural Settings of India

Author(s) Rashmi Mahajan, Anuj Kumar Tyagi
Country India
Abstract ABSTRACT
Background: Malaria remains a major public health concern in resource-limited rural settings, where access to reliable diagnostic tools is often constrained. The MAL Card rapid diagnostic test (RDT) offers a potential alternative to traditional microscopic methods, but its diagnostic accuracy in rural healthcare settings needs further evaluation.
Objective: This study aims to compare the performance of the Advantage MAL Card rapid test with conventional microscopy for malaria diagnosis in a rural hospital in India.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among suspected malaria patients. Blood samples were tested using both the MAL Card rapid test and microscopy (gold standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the MAL Card were assessed against microscopy.
Results: The MAL Card rapid test demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.12% and specificity of 99.54%, with a PPV of 80% and NPV of 99.88%. While the rapid test provided quicker results, microscopy remained more accurate in detecting malaria cases.
Conclusion: The MAL Card test proves to be a reliable and efficient diagnostic tool for malaria in resource-limited rural settings, offering high sensitivity, specificity, and ease of use. Its rapid turnaround time makes it a valuable first-line diagnostic method, particularly where microscopy is inaccessible. However, the risk of false positives necessitates confirmatory testing in certain cases to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment. Despite this limitation, integrating the MAL Card into malaria control programs can enhance surveillance, support timely intervention, and contribute to reducing the malaria burden in endemic regions.
Keywords Malaria, MAL Card, Microscopy, Rapid Diagnostic Test, Rural Healthcare
Field Medical / Pharmacy
Published In Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2025
Published On 2025-03-08
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 1Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com