International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 7, Issue 2 (March-April 2025) Submit your research before last 3 days of April to publish your research paper in the issue of March-April.
Submit Research Paper Join as a Reviewer

Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker TurnItIn

Call for Paper

Volume 7 Issue 2
March-April 2025

Submit your research paper

Indexing Partners
Academia Advanced Sciences Index Bielefeld Academic Search Engine CiteSeer DRJI Google Scholar Independent Search Engine & Directory Network ISI (International Scientific Indexing) Issuu Mendeley Research Networks
RefSeek ResearcherId - Thomson Reuters ResearchGate Scirus Scribd Semantic Scholar UTeM - Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Wiki for Call for Papers WorldCat Zenodo

Skills of Filipino Teachers in Choosing Academic Evaluation

Author(s) Ms. Femar Bangquio Matratar
Country Philippines
Abstract This research is titled “Skills of Filipino Teachers in Choosing Academic Evaluation.” Its aim is to present the level of skills of Filipino teachers in selecting assessment methods for evaluating students based on the selected competencies for the first year of high school. From this, an academic evaluation framework can be developed that is suitable for each domain of learning. The study used a qualitative and quantitative design, a descriptive method, and an evaluative approach to clearly present the essential findings of the study. Simple random sampling was applied in selecting the competencies. Meanwhile, the researcher developed a questionnaire to collect data. The dynamic assessment theory was used throughout the study to interpret how teachers approach assessment methods for evaluating students. The study found that 82% of teachers selected cognitive assessments for cognitive competencies, while the remaining 18% chose psychomotor assessments for cognitive competencies. In the affective domain, the study revealed that 50% of teachers selected psychomotor assessments for affective competencies, 25% chose affective assessments, and another 25% selected cognitive assessments for affective competencies. Finally, in the psychomotor domain, 50% of teachers chose psychomotor assessments for psychomotor competencies, 17% selected affective assessments, and 33% chose cognitive assessments for psychomotor competencies. It can also be noted that teachers have a high level of skill in choosing assessments for the cognitive domain, a low level of skill in the affective domain, and an adequate level of skill in the psychomotor domain. Based on these findings, an academic evaluation framework was also developed for the affective domain.
Keywords assessment, domain, skill, teacher
Published In Volume 7, Issue 2, March-April 2025
Published On 2025-03-20
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i02.39311
Short DOI https://doi.org/g89vvp
View / Download PDF File

Share this



E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef

CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.

IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr

Downloads
Research Paper Format Copyright Permission Form and Undertaking Form Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 2Cover Page Vol 7 Isu 1Cover Page Vol 6 Isu 6

All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.

CC-BY-SA Open Access

About IJFMR
Fees & Payment
Current Issue
Publication Archive 		Submit Research Paper
Track Submission Status
Publication Guidelines
Publication Ethics
Peer Review & Plagiarism 		Join as a Reviewer
Editors & Reviewers
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Reviewer Membership Certi. 		Website/Journal Policies
Usage Policy
Content Policies
Privacy Policy
Contact Us +91-9687-828-838 editor@ijfmr.com