International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024
Indexing Partners
Criminal Justice Implications of Forensic Evidence: Assessing Its Significance in Determining Guilt
Author(s) | Adv. Deepali Shivaji Bhalshankar |
---|---|
Country | India |
Abstract | Recent research has indicated that the general public frequently perceives forensic evidence as prone to inaccuracies and dependent on substantial subjective interpretation. By contrasting the reliability of forensic evidence with that of eyewitness testimony in criminal cases and testing for the existence of a "CSI effect," this study explores the public's perception of the relevance of this type of evidence. In this specific survey experiment, participants were assigned randomly to one of seven vignette scenarios. These scenarios were created using a design matrix with three factors: crime type (murder or rape), evidence type (DNA or fingerprint), and the presence or absence of victim and bystander eyewitness testimony (with the exception of the murder scenario, which had no victim testimony). The results indicate that the presence of forensic evidence increases the likelihood of a guilty judgment and the conviction rate. There was no change in either the expected or intended sentence duration as a result of including forensic evidence. Respondents predicted a longer sentence for a rape offender when forensic evidence was presented. However, this did not lead to any changes in their expectations regarding the likely punishment for the defendant. The investigation did not uncover any evidence of a CSI effect. In general, the findings indicate that forensic evidence, especially DNA, tends to have a greater impact on influencing judgments rather than influencing sentencing decisions. |
Keywords | Forensic Evidence, Guilt Decisions, Sentencing, Criminal Trials, DNA Evidence |
Published In | Volume 5, Issue 5, September-October 2023 |
Published On | 2023-09-28 |
Cite This | Criminal Justice Implications of Forensic Evidence: Assessing Its Significance in Determining Guilt - Adv. Deepali Shivaji Bhalshankar - IJFMR Volume 5, Issue 5, September-October 2023. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.7003 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i05.7003 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/gstc8w |
Share this
E-ISSN 2582-2160
doi
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.