International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Reviewer Referral Program
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
WSMCDD-2025
GSMCDD-2025
Conferences Published ↓
RBS:RH-COVID-19 (2023)
ICMRS'23
PIPRDA-2023
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 6 Issue 6
November-December 2024
Indexing Partners
Empowering NCLAT: The Review Revolution
Author(s) | Kavimayil N V |
---|---|
Country | India |
Abstract | NCLT is an established quasi-judicial body responsible for resolving civil corporate disputes brought about by the Companies Act. It was established under the Companies Act of 2013, and it has a number of powers and functions, including approving various schemes of arrangement and reconstruction, compounding offenses under the Companies Act, protecting shareholders, removing directors, and other powers and functions as provided for under the Companies Act of 2013 and other applicable laws. Its jurisdiction incorporates different company law issues as well as Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Cases. Class action lawsuits may be considered by it, and decisions made by it may be challenged before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and, in certain situations, before the Supreme Court of India. Recalling a judgment often entails nullifying or reversing a court's ruling, frequently due to erroneous factual or procedural interpretations. It is a prerogative that the Tribunal naturally possesses, as stated under Rule 11. This chapter deals with the recent overriding judgment (Union Bank of India (Erstwhile Corporation Bank) vs. Dinkar T. Venkatasubramanian & Ors [(2023) ibclaw. in 381 NCLAT]) of the NCLAT’s reviewing power by referring to the previous judgment of Union Bank of India V. Financial Creditors of M/s. Amtek Auto Ltd. & Ors encourage readers to read the current judgment's contrast section, which asks, what would happen if NCLAT had the authority to review its decision? |
Keywords | Review, Inherent Power, Recall, and IBC. |
Published In | Volume 5, Issue 6, November-December 2023 |
Published On | 2023-11-25 |
Cite This | Empowering NCLAT: The Review Revolution - Kavimayil N V - IJFMR Volume 5, Issue 6, November-December 2023. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9352 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9352 |
Short DOI | https://doi.org/gs63v2 |
Share this
E-ISSN 2582-2160
doi
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJFMR DOI prefix is
10.36948/ijfmr
Downloads
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.