International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160     Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 6 Issue 6 November-December 2024 Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.

Beyond Borders: A Global Comparison of Euthanasia Laws

Author(s) Kanika Singh Solanki, Priyanshi Mittal, Parthvi D Patel
Country India
Abstract Euthanasia, the planned termination of someone's life to alleviate struggle, continues to be a debatable and ethically complicated problem globally. Within this elaborate internet of perspectives, the worldwide landscape sees the legalization and regulation of euthanasia followed by various countries. This paper explores the difficult panorama of euthanasia laws, evaluating the location of India and international perspectives, as the requests for euthanasia increase internationally due to various medical, socio-emotional, and existential elements. Laws on euthanasia are taken up by nations that allow such practice, despite conditional legalization, including the UK, and existence assist withdrawal is allowed within the United States. Following the Aruna Shanbaug case, India shifted its legal role, supplying conditional acceptance of passive euthanasia. However, lively euthanasia remains to watch for parliamentary dialogue. Addressing requests for euthanasia could want a nuanced method, mixed with individualized palliative care. This paper provides a bridge between India's regulatory framework and global strategies and is enriched with the aid of the complexities of euthanasia legal guidelines. The prison history of euthanasia in India has witnessed profound adjustments through the years, marked by seminal judicial judgments and legislative discussions. At Gift, India has no precise regulation around euthanasia. It is, however, a count number of files that in 2018, the Supreme Court of India gave a landmark judgment mentioning that the idea of 'proper to die' belongs to the domain of fundamental rights below Article 21 of the Constitution. The judgment made active euthanasia criminal, and it laid down tips approximately its implementation, including that which incorporates a dwelling will and which has also made provision for having a medical board involved.
Keywords Keywords: Euthanasia, Palliative, Acceptance, Legalization, Passive
Published In Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024
Published On 2024-06-27
Cite This Beyond Borders: A Global Comparison of Euthanasia Laws - Kanika Singh Solanki, Priyanshi Mittal, Parthvi D Patel - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 3, May-June 2024. DOI 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23250
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.23250
Short DOI https://doi.org/gt243n

Share this